![]() |
Is it possible that a
reclusive man-like
creature inhabits the remote areas of our planet? Why not ? Isn't it
arrogant
of us to assume we know of all the species on this huge planet ?
Scientists
will tell you that we don't. Just over a decade ago, a unknown
animal now
named the Okapi was discovered. More recently a new ape
species was found in Sumtra. What about creatures we know
of , but
are
thought to be extinct ? The coelacanth was thought to be extinct for 70
million years until they were discovered alive and well in 1938. So is
it really that hard to believe that a hair covered, man-like creature
could
exist on the verge of discovery ? In many remote areas of the world
there
have been sightings of just such a creature. Known by many names such
as
Sasquatch, Yeti, Almas and many more. Is this an unknown primate, the
"missing
link" or some other yet unknown species ? There is evidence to support
the existence of just such a creature in the Northwestern United States
as well as other remote areas.
There are still numerous
sightings every
year. The descriptions of the creatures are very similar from sighting
to sighting. There are discrepancies in some of the details but the
mind
does play tricks on us when frightened. Exaggeration and hoaxes do
account
for some of the discrepancies in the descriptions as well. The
height
is the most varied detail. Witnesses have reported the creatures to be
from 5'6" to 8' +. This is easily explained if you take into account
the
possible age difference of the particular creature. Did they see and
adult
or juvenile ? There would be a noticeable size difference depending on
the age. |
Sightings![]() The Full Patterson Video Footage Over the years, rumors abounded that Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin hoaxed the whole incident. It even went further by saying that a special effects man named John Chambers, who designed the makeup in the Planet of the Apes movies, designed the suit. He has denied any involvement. Movie special effects people claim the film is just a man in a suit. Some scientists still cling to their belief that the film is authentic. Sadly, Roger Patterson died in 1972 of cancer. Did he go to his grave laughing? Or did he firmly believe at the time of his death that he had seen Bigfoot? In March of 1992, Bob Gimlin admitted that he might have been fooled. He gave thought to the possibility that Roger concocted the whole thing and Bob was an unknowing eyewitness to one of the most elaborate hoaxes in the world. - adamwolf@theshadowlands. net Additional Notes: The creature that was filmed was a female, while you cannot see in this view, breast are clearly visible in in other frames of the film. Scientists who have studied the film have said that the estimated stride of the creature is larger than that of a man. They also say it would have been very difficult for a man for simulate this large stride. Footprints were also found later at the same location. The footprints were the same type as typically found at a Bigfoot sighting. ![]() "No matter how convincing supposed Bigfoot photos or films may be, until the ultimate living proof is in, alleged Bigfoot photos and films must remain alleged. Only the true test of time will tell." - Cliff Crook The sighting report on this case ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Photograph
of an alleged Skunk Ape. Taken by David Shealy in Florida's Big Cypress
Swamp.
![]() Northern Minnesota deer hunters say they caught Bigfoot on camera - 2009 On August 26, 1957, William Roe provided a sworn statement about his encounter with a Bigfoot. Roe, who had worked as a hunter, trapper, and a road worker, was working in British Columbia in 1955. He had hiked five miles up Mica Mountain to explore a deserted mine. When Roe stepped out of a
clearing,
he saw what he thought was a grizzly bear. When the animal stood
up, he realized this was no grizzly bear! The animal, a female,
was
six feet tall, three feet wide, and weighed approximately 300
lbs.
Her arms reached almost to her knees, and when she Roe was hiding in some brush and was able to observe the creature from a distance of some 20 feet. He watched, fascinated, as she used her white, even teeth to eat leaves from a nearby bush. Her head was "higher at the back than at the front"; her nose was flat. Only the area around her mouth was bare - the rest of her body was covered in hair, none of which was longer than an inch. The ears looked very much like a human's. The eyes were small and dark, similar to a bear's. At this point, the animal caught Roe's scent and walked back the way she had come, looking over her shoulder as she went. As she disappeared into the bush, Roe heard her make a sound he described as "a kind of a whinny". Roe wanted to find out whether the animal was a vegetarian or whether she consumed meat as well. He searched for and found signs (feces) in several places. Upon examination, no hair or insect shells were found. Roe concluded this animal lived solely on vegetation. While Roe could not be sure this creature was, in fact, a Bigfoot, the logical conclusion is that he was fortunate enough to be able to observe this elusive creature up close. by CurlyJoe@theshadowlands.net |
By Cyndi Hall With summer in full swing, people are outdoors more than ever: hiking, fishing, camping, swimming…and berry picking. It makes one wonder why there haven’t been a few Bigfoot sightings. Well, there has been… Last week, two Ontario women say they saw what might have been the legendary creature in northwestern Ontario. Helen Pahpasay and her mother were picking blueberries last Tuesday, July 22, (2008) when they spotted a large, hulking figure from their truck at about 10 a.m. CT. "It was black, about eight feet long and all black, and the way it walked was upright, human-like, but more — I don't know how to describe it — more of a husky walk, I guess," she told CBC News. "It didn't look normal." The Bigfoot apparently saw the women and ran into the woods, Pahpasay said. She and her mother seriously thought about going after the creature to try to get a better look, but were so shaken by the experience they finally decided to abandon their berry picking altogether and went home. Once word got around, others returned to the area and found a large, six-toed footprint, Pahpasay said. "What do I think it was? Right now I'm not even sure what it was. But it really scared both of us," she said. "There's been talk of Bigfoot, Sasquatch. And I'm still not sure what it was, but I've never seen anything like it." Pahpasay also said that she and her mother aren't the only people in the area with a Bigfoot story. There were some men from their neighborhood that have said they too, have seen the creature a few years ago. "I've never believed it before, no. I'm not even quite sure what it still is today, even after what I've seen," she said. Many believe that Bigfoot could be roaming woods from California up the West Coast and across Canada. In April 2005, a ferry operator in Norway house, Manitoba, videotaped three minutes of footage of what he said was a Bigfoot. However, the video, which was shown on an American television, was indistinct, failing to live up to its billing as "footage of the century." In 2006, several people in northern Manitoba and Saskatchewan reported seeing a Bigfoot-like figure in the woods around Flin Flon, Manitoba. Of course, skeptics say it's ridiculous to think that a large mammal could have evaded detection in North America throughout history. Despite numerous alleged sightings, no one has ever produced concrete evidence such as skulls or bones. They also say that the footprints, film and photos can be easily faked. Another interesting story that came out this summer is the alleged plug of hair that was retrieved after a Bigfoot sighting. University of Alberta professor David Coltman was recently sent the sample. (The actual sighting was July 25, 2005). He was told that a Bigfoot was seen and apparently realized it was being observed. It jumped and took off running at a great speed, crashing through low hanging branches, leaving a large sample of hair. The hair is currently being analyzed. |
Dave
has a weekly radio show on ParaX radio called Paranoraml Straight Talk
and they cover all types of topics including cryptozoology. Interview
with Eric Altman of Pennsylvania Bigfoot Society
|
|
|
|
Bigfoot
Field Guide Informational Video-Memorial Day Footage
The
famous Memorial Day footage
that has a purported Bigfoot running across a hillside.
|
The
Bigfoot Field Guide-The Freeman Footage |
Paul
Freeman Footage |
Manitoba
Bigfoot, this is actual
footage of the creature that was filmed in Manitoba Canada in 2005.
|
This footage
was shot in the
Florda Everglades and is purportedly of the Florida Bigfoot or Skunk Ape |
Bigfoot
from Helo, Middle Tennessee 4/27/07
More
footage due to interest. This
thing ran into swamp SE of sighting.
|
Texas
Report on N.W. Bigfoot |
Hunter
Spots Bigfoot In Pennsylvania Woods
A man
hunting north of Pittsburgh
said his camera captured images of bigfoot.
|
Fouke Monster- The
Encounter with a Bigfoot |
South Idaho bigfoot sighting |
Documented Bigfoot
sighting |
Monster Quest:
Review Patterson Film - Saying its Real |
National Geographic
American
Paranormal reviews Patterson Footage - Its Real |
![]() |
Wild Creek photo © 1998 Cliff Crook
(c)Cliff Crook/Fortean Pic Lib. 2000
The other images on this page were obtained from publicly available sources, and to the best of our knowledge, the images are in the public domain. If you own the copyright on any image on this page, and you would like us to remove it, please identify yourself and the image, and we will. If you own the copyright and you are willing to give us permission to use the image, we would like to know that also, thank you.
© 2009 davejuliano@theshadowlands.net